Science vs. Religion Essay Example for Free

Science vs. Religion EssayThe debate between devotion and scientific discipline has been going on for years, clashing together with different ideologies. The line of merchandise combines historical and philosophical approaches to contest to each side, battling to disprove each other. While religion is based on faith, using the will of deity to guide them in their observations, scientists use experiments to find discoveries based on facts. The conflict between religion and science hasnt been fiery in modern times, comp ard to the years where science was inferior to religion, but the topic has still been brought up in discussion. Can someone be some(prenominal) a scientist and a religious person? Although they may both pursue knowledge, there methodologies are completely different, pitting each other into heated discussions. In our past lecture with Brother Guy Consolmagno, he argues that Christianity isnt completely based on faith in theology. The church is also continuously studying the cosmea, like scientists, trying to learn more about our origins. comparable to(predicate) to science, ideals in the church changes, and arent always set in stone.The Bible may be the guide for most religious people, but there are also different interpretations of the Bible that people find to counteract certain claims. Guy uses evidence that the first medieval Church universities started the modern study of astronomy. The university well-educated grammar, rhetoric, and dialectic, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music courses, which showed that it was like any other university teaching students for a better career. The university may be Christian based, but it didnt ignore what science offered them. check to Guy, Jesuits run 25% of all observations in Europe.They helped create the definition of a year, based on our four seasons. Despite the differences between religion and science, Guy believes that we ass comingle ideas from both sides to progress our studies of the universe tear down further. (Consolmagno) One of the topics in The Constant Fire introduces James Clerk Maxwell, one of the great physicists in his time, and his view of religion and science co-existing with each other. Maxwell formulated equations that explained electric and magnetic fields and the unification of these concepts into electromagnetism.Maxwells equations and mathematical laws are the reason why we book radio, television, and all electronic technology today although he constructed scientific laws for his devotion to science, he was also a devout Christian. I believethat Mans chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him forever. (Maxwell) He attended church regularly, read scripture before going to sleep at night, and even institutionalizeted the entire psalms to memory. It showed that his religious belief was unyielding, despite his scientific advances in society.At the same time I think that each individualistic man should do all he can to impress his own mind with the extent, the order, and unity of the universe, and should carry these ideas with him as he reads the Bible. (Maxwell) Learning about the universe through a different perspective doesnt waver doubt instead, it enriches spiritual understanding. Maxwell set an example showing how his experience in science was an aspiring journey to glorify his God. (Frank) The Constant Fire also explains Isaac Newtons perception of his work towards science contrary to his religious beliefs.Newton take a firm stand himself as a priest of nature. Like any religious person, he believed there was a God of absolute power. Although, he also believed that his work was exploring Gods greatness, reservation science a way of explaining his creation. It is the perfection of Gods works that they are all done with the superior simplicity. He is the God of order amp not confusion. (Newton) Both scientific philosophy and religion were inseparable, as both concepts bounced off each other.Even comin g from one of the greatest scientists in the orld, like James Maxell, Newton concluded that there ironically was no warfare between science and religion. (Frank) Science comes from the creativity of an individual making up a new hypothesis. Religion comes from varied interpretations of how they view the spiritual being they worship. We dont have enough evidence from the universe to commit to a godless path, and we are too knowledgeable enough to pledge to a specific religious ideal. I believe there is such affaire as a middle ground taking the possibility of new ideas and building an equal foundation.I still keep to the constitution of scientific surmisal composing our world, but I also keep multiple hypotheses in mind. We should be open-minded, and explore the different possibilities of the unfathomable unknowns of our universe. Im not mysophobic to ask the lingering question science and religions try to explain.